I watched the 2008 Wolf Blitzer interview with Trump and
came to a horrifying conclusion: Trump did not corrupt the GOP. The GOP
corrupted Trump.
Back then Trump was talking about how amazing Nancy Pelosi
was, how Clinton’s impeachment was over nothing important, and how Bush
deserved to be impeached for lying us into a war. All of these statements are
objectively true. That 2008 Trump was a narcissistic blow-hard, but he was
still connected to reality. How did he get replaced with this Fox-News zombie?
To ask the question is to answer it. Fox News ate Trump’s
brain the same way it has eaten so many of our parents and uncles and aunts
brain’s; with a steady diet of outrage, fear, hate, entitlement, and empty
flattery. Trump watches Fox News all the time, and like any other person who
only watches Fox News, Trump has become a monster of the id, a creature
entirely driven by irrational fears and imagined dangers and an overwhelming
sense of lost status.
This should have been obvious all along. Trump was the least
consequential figure on that stage of seventeen Republican candidates. Trump
played to the crowd and was rewarded with poll numbers; so he played harder and
got more. But Trump’s ability to completely re-invent himself as a conservative
fire-breather (after having been associated with liberals to the point where
the Clintons attended one of his weddings) was not merely a sign of his
shallowness; it as a signifier of his willingness to serve the cause. The reason
the Republican electorate chose Trump over all those other men was not in spite
of his malleability but because of it.
I have long argued that Trump’s unfitness was a crucial
attraction to the Republican electorate, because it demonstrated the power of
white male privilege. I argued that they selected him because he had no other
assets than white maleness, and thus his power could only be derived from it.
Ted Cruz has a brain; Jeb Bush has a name; John Kasich and all the others have hard
work and experience. Only Trump was devoid of any other positive attributes that
could justify his rulership. Thus, I argued, they chose Trump to be the avatar
of privilege, and cheered every time he did something horrible because his ability
to be both stupid and criminal and yet still retain power was daily proof that
white maleness was both necessary and sufficient to wield authority. But now I
think I was giving them too much credit.
Trump’s unfitness as captain of the ship of state was his
most important attribute, because they want to steer the ship onto the rocks.
Their goal is not merely to demonstrate the power of privilege; their goal is
to demonstrate the unfitness of democracy itself. The Republican argument is
that democracy is too weak to survive because it cannot defend itself against
vandals. That the Republicans themselves are playing the part of the vandals is
no objection to a people steeped in hypocrisy.
The Evangelicals have repeatedly told us that God works
through imperfect tools. They have repeatedly framed their support of Trump as
a support of God’s agenda, not Trump himself. They have not merely excused but practically
celebrated Trump’s many un-Christian attributes from profanity to adultery,
which I interpreted as hypocrisy. I now realize those negative qualities are
the point. They cheer when Trump does something terrible, when he wrecks the
economy or weakens our alliances or diminishes the prestige and honor of the
office, because all of those things are necessary steps on the way to the death
of democracy.
When democracy is finished, when the country is in such dire
straits that even liberals cry out for a strongman to restore law and order,
then the conservatives will toss Trump aside like used toilet paper. His fate
is as likely to be found on the end of a lamppost as not, and conservatives are
more than likely to be the ones to put him there. Once God is done with his
imperfect vessel, it is merely clay again.
In his place conservatives will offer an actual strongman,
someone both intelligent and competent and wholly willing to create a new
order. This is why none of the other Republican candidates had a chance; for
all of their faults, none of them are traitors. None of those other men would
willingly preside over the collapse of American democracy.
They will, however, stand aside and watch it fall, as
helpless in the face of the fury of a demographic losing its traditional stranglehold
on power as they were in the face of a man who could throw out childish insults
on national television. Hypocrisy, and the lack of shame that goes with it, has
long been their stock in trade; Trump simply abandoned hypocrisy and all
concept of shame with it.
The electorate sensed this emptiness in Trump, this need to
be flattered regardless of the cost to others or even to himself, and they
chose him to be their sacrificial lamb. He will bring down the state around him,
like Samson in the temple of Dagon. He will usher in the kingdom of God, even
though he will not be permitted to join it. They will use him up and cast him
aside and the future will record Trump not as Hitler, but merely as Marinus van
der Lubbe.
It’s almost enough to make me feel sorry for him.
I agree. How will COVID19 reshape the playing field? Impeachment is all but forgotten and I worry that America will choose him again.
ReplyDeleteI think Joe Biden has this in the bag. All America ever wanted was to prove that the worst white man was better than the best woman or person of color, and Joe is now clearly the least competent of all the Democratic candidates. His sundowning will be why he wins - enough Trump voters will switch to vote for the undeserving white guy who doesn't also bring economic and international melt-down.
DeleteIf nothing else, COVID19 will remove the Republican's ability to win elections. They are only holding on with razor thin margins as it is; after a million deaths concentrated in the older cohort they won't have a chance.
Now that white male privilege is off the table - since no matter who wins white male privilege reigns supreme - I expect a number of people to suddenly recall the value of policy.
But maybe Uncle Joe can pull a fast one on them. Pick Warren or Harris as his running mate, and then resign halfway through. It's not as good as electing a woman but I'll take it. :)